Against Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint Act Essay -- DNA Databa

Abstractcalciums propose 69 and the deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprint Act both expand whitlow deoxyribonucleic acid databasesfar beyond what is necessary to protect citizens and prosecute furious crime. desoxyribonucleic acid profilingtechniques and databases have developed largely over the go bad fifteen years, and the recentexpansions atomic number 18 only a part of an current trend of bit creep that characterizes databaseexpansion. hint 69 and the desoxyribonucleic acid Fingerprint Act expand DNA databases originallydesigned to house DNA samples from violent criminals to include samples from anyone arrestedfor a felony crime. This is unreasonable because some(prenominal) persons arrested for felonies are incessantlyconvicted or even tried, but under these expansions their DNA will be stored in a criminal DNAdatabase alongside convicted rapists, murderers, and other felons.California Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint ActConsiderable Expansions in Criminal DNA Datab asesProposition 69, passed last November by voters in California, and the DNA FingerprintAct, passed recently in Congress, both importantly expand DNA databases designed to houseand identify DNA samples from dangerous, violent criminals. These recent expansions are onlypart are only part of a function creep phenomenon that has characterized DNA databaseexpansion since states began keeping DNA profiles on script in the 1990s. Not until recently,however, have the expansions crossed the line between legalize DNA profiling for lawenforcement or forensic purposes and an invasion of privacy. Proposition 69 and the DNAFingerprint Act do not significantly improve the ability of law enforcement agencies to prosecuteviolent criminals. Instead, they treat many innocent citizens as criminals, storing their res... ...2048/cgi/content/full/352/26/26692Simoncelli, Tania. Steinhardt, Barry. Californias Proposition 69 A dangerous precedent forcriminal DNA databases. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics. Internet. cited 2005 Oct 3.Available from http//search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=177686463Rothstein, Mark A. transmitted justice. The New England Journal of Medicine. Internet. cited2005 Nov 6. Available from http//content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/26/26674Proposition 69 DNA samples, collection, database, funding, initiative statute. CaliforniaSecretary of State. Internet. cited 2005 Oct 15. Available fromhttp//222.ss.ca.gov/elections/bp_nov04/prop_60_entire.pdfSenate reauthorizes violence against women 5 act. Senator Jon Kyl Press Office. Internet. cited2005 Oct 15. Available from http//kyl.senate/gov/record.cfm?id=246925