Ozymandias and the Grecian Urn Paper

Even though Ozymandias by Percy Shelley and Ode to a classical Urn by John Keats sound bid very contrastive types of poems, they still share some of the same characteristics. In Ozymandias, Shelley tells a story of how a man found a ancient statue of a exp atomic number 53nt, with the haggling My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings,/ Look on my Works, ye Might, and despair The statue was depleted into pieces, and the land was bare, with nonhing to look on (11).In Ode to a classic Urn, Keats is intercommunicate to an ancient urn and describing the unchanging pictures that are on it. These poems are very different in how their aspirations act with the passing of time and in the feelings that they invoke in the reader, only when very similar in the sentimentalististic characteristics that they represent. Ozymandias and Ode to a Grecian Urn are very different in how the statue and the urn interact with the passing of time. In Ozymandias, Shelley shows how a manmade object i s supplanted in time by nature.Not tho is the statue destroyed, but it is also obvious that the town has also been destroyed when Shelley states that, goose egg beside remains. Round the decay/ Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare (12-13). Nature has the superpower to destroy everything that a man can make, anything from a simple statue to an integral town. However, Ode to a Grecian Urn is an entire poem about a manmade object that has withstood the passage of time and anything nature threw its way.Keats states that even When old age shall this coevals waste/ Thou shalt remain (46-47). Keats does not even acknowledge the point that nature could destroy the urn in a split second. Since the urn is a agricultural historian, it has been around for a while, meaning it has probably been through some fluctuation of a natural disaster or at the very least a rough storm, and nature still has not chosen to destroy it (3). Shelleys poem and Keatss poem also differ in the feeling s that they invoke in the reader. Ozymandias has a very off-putting sound to it.Shelley puts words that defend negative connotations to them same when he is describing the business leader with a bring down/ And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command (4-5). The poem gives the reader a feeling of solitaryliness and emptiness by using lines like The lone and aim sands and boundless and bare (14, 13). In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the connotations of the words that Keats uses are completely opposite. Keats even describes the urn as being sufficient to tell A flowery tale more sweetly than their verse line (4).Keats then goes on to state that the melodies unheard/ Are sweeter therefore, ye soft pipes, butterfly on (11-12). These lines are so light and pretty especially compared to the callousness of Shelleys poem. Keats describes the beautiful pictures on the urn throughout the rest of the poem, even reservation a sacrifice sound peaceful. Even though the way the poems objects int eract with the passing of time and the feelings the poems invoke in the reader differ greatly, the romantic characteristics that both poems symbolize are very similar.Ironically, the opposite parallels of the two poems have a way of representing a romantic mindset. For example, the romantics believed that nature is mantic to apprise. In Ozymandias, nature destroys a statue and a town that had arisen from greed and the abuse of power. The king is stated to have a sneer of cold command and a heart that fed his own desires (4,8). The trunkless legs of stone and a shattered osculator makes it sound like nature was not very happy with the kings show of authority (2, 4).In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the manmade object not being destroyed by nature can still teach the reader. The urn was not made for power and greed, but to show beauty and love. The urn depicts many an(prenominal) scenes of nature and peacefulness. Another similarity that both poems share is that they show the insignificanc e of something that is supposed to be great, like a king, and the value of something that is supposed to be normal, like an urn. Once again, in Ozymandias, the king and his great town are destroyed.This depends like Shelleys way of rooting for the revolutions, of making a king not so important anymore. After all is said and done, the lone and level sands stretch far away (14). No matter whether one is a king or a peasant, everyone dies, and in the end, being a king does not make you greater than a peasant. In Ode to a Grecian Urn, Keats glorifies the common urn. He makes the urn, which could have probably been found in many homes, seem special to the reader. Like many romantics, he took an ordinary item and turned it into an extraordinary one.Shelleys Ozymandias and Keatss Ode to a Grecian Urn differ in the ways that the statue and the urn interact with the passing of time and in the feelings that they invoke in the readers however, they still ironically share similar romantic cha racteristics. The poems may not seem very comparable at first, but once the reader considers what each poet is trying to convey, they do not seem so different after all. Again, it is the ironic and opposite parallels that actually resume up to express the same beliefs of both poets.